https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179742 Penalty for an alleged check-post violation under the Rajasthan Value Added Tax Act, 2003 was examined in light of whether the goods were accompanied by supporting documents and whether the facts were covered by an earlier decision. The High Court held that the case fell squarely within the earlier judgment relied on by the appellate authorities, and no error, illegality, or perversity was shown in the order affirming deletion of penalty. The revision was accordingly rejected, and the penalty deletion was upheld. en-us Thu, 04 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Mar 2016 10:54:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179742 Penalty for an alleged check-post violation under the Rajasthan Value Added Tax Act, 2003 was examined in light of whether the goods were accompanied by supporting documents and whether the facts were covered by an earlier decision. The High Court held that the case fell squarely within the earlier judgment relied on by the appellate authorities, and no error, illegality, or perversity was shown in the order affirming deletion of penalty. The revision was accordingly rejected, and the penalty deletion was upheld. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 04 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179742