<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 971 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179739</link>
    <description>Interim relief was considered for duty, interest and penalty demanded on clinker cleared to units in a Special Economic Zone, in the context of Notification No. 67/95-CE and its proviso relating to exempt final products. The Tribunal noted that an identical issue involving the same assessee had already been dealt with earlier, where predeposit had been waived and recovery stayed. Following that earlier approach and without departing from it, the Tribunal granted waiver of predeposit and stayed recovery of the disputed amounts during pendency of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Apr 2017 08:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=419425" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 971 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179739</link>
      <description>Interim relief was considered for duty, interest and penalty demanded on clinker cleared to units in a Special Economic Zone, in the context of Notification No. 67/95-CE and its proviso relating to exempt final products. The Tribunal noted that an identical issue involving the same assessee had already been dealt with earlier, where predeposit had been waived and recovery stayed. Following that earlier approach and without departing from it, the Tribunal granted waiver of predeposit and stayed recovery of the disputed amounts during pendency of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179739</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>