<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules No Fraud: Extended Limitation Period Unjustified in Cenvat Credit Case Due to Consistent Disclosure.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=27874</link>
    <description>Cenvat Credit - Non maintaining of separate accounts - extended period of limitation invoked - As there is no fraud or suppression of fact involved in this case as the department was all along kept informed of the respondent&#039;s activity and therefore there is no reason for justification of invoking the extended period of limitation. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2016 18:28:34 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2016 18:28:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=419395" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules No Fraud: Extended Limitation Period Unjustified in Cenvat Credit Case Due to Consistent Disclosure.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=27874</link>
      <description>Cenvat Credit - Non maintaining of separate accounts - extended period of limitation invoked - As there is no fraud or suppression of fact involved in this case as the department was all along kept informed of the respondent&#039;s activity and therefore there is no reason for justification of invoking the extended period of limitation. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2016 18:28:34 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=27874</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>