<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (11) TMI 21 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2581</link>
    <description>Writ interference at the show cause notice stage is exceptional and is justified only where lack of jurisdiction or abuse of process is prima facie shown. The Court found that the High Court could intervene because the notice appeared to repeat a dispute already conclusively decided in earlier litigation. Since the classification of the products as Ayurvedic medicines had been finally determined, the later notice merely sought to reopen the same issue without a new legal or factual basis. The notice was therefore unsustainable, and the quashing of the notice was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2025 16:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41938" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (11) TMI 21 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2581</link>
      <description>Writ interference at the show cause notice stage is exceptional and is justified only where lack of jurisdiction or abuse of process is prima facie shown. The Court found that the High Court could intervene because the notice appeared to repeat a dispute already conclusively decided in earlier litigation. Since the classification of the products as Ayurvedic medicines had been finally determined, the later notice merely sought to reopen the same issue without a new legal or factual basis. The notice was therefore unsustainable, and the quashing of the notice was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2581</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>