<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (1) TMI 112 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179715</link>
    <description>An agreement will be treated as a lease, not a licence, where its terms and surrounding circumstances show a transfer of the right to enjoy property and creation of an interest, rather than mere permission to use it. A licence under the Easements Act gives only a personal right without any estate or interest, while a lease under the Transfer of Property Act creates an interest in the property. Labels used by the parties are not decisive; the true nature of the arrangement depends on the document and circumstances. Exclusive possession is an important indicator, and here the fixed term, payment structure, absence of reserved rights of entry or possession, and exclusive possession supported a lease over the loft.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2016 13:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=419369" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (1) TMI 112 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179715</link>
      <description>An agreement will be treated as a lease, not a licence, where its terms and surrounding circumstances show a transfer of the right to enjoy property and creation of an interest, rather than mere permission to use it. A licence under the Easements Act gives only a personal right without any estate or interest, while a lease under the Transfer of Property Act creates an interest in the property. Labels used by the parties are not decisive; the true nature of the arrangement depends on the document and circumstances. Exclusive possession is an important indicator, and here the fixed term, payment structure, absence of reserved rights of entry or possession, and exclusive possession supported a lease over the loft.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179715</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>