<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 1194 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179708</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on the allowability of expenditure on production of advertisement films and club membership fees as business expenditure. The Tribunal remitted the issue of expenditure on acquiring software back to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication in accordance with guidelines from a Special Bench decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2016 16:00:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=419361" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 1194 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179708</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on the allowability of expenditure on production of advertisement films and club membership fees as business expenditure. The Tribunal remitted the issue of expenditure on acquiring software back to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication in accordance with guidelines from a Special Bench decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179708</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>