<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (1) TMI 243 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179707</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld. CIT (A) in dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal, ruling that the capital gain could not be taxed in A.Y. 2007-08. It was determined that the transfer occurred on 04.11.2004, not on 22.02.2007, as contended by the revenue. Additionally, the Tribunal found the applicability of section 50C irrelevant as there was no transfer in the relevant assessment year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2016 15:45:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=419360" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (1) TMI 243 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179707</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld. CIT (A) in dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal, ruling that the capital gain could not be taxed in A.Y. 2007-08. It was determined that the transfer occurred on 04.11.2004, not on 22.02.2007, as contended by the revenue. Additionally, the Tribunal found the applicability of section 50C irrelevant as there was no transfer in the relevant assessment year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179707</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>