<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 1159 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179696</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay upheld the deletion of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, ruling that no penalty should be imposed when facts are consistent with both concealed and non-concealed income. The appeal was dismissed with no costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2016 12:36:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=419343" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 1159 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179696</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay upheld the deletion of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, ruling that no penalty should be imposed when facts are consistent with both concealed and non-concealed income. The appeal was dismissed with no costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179696</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>