<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 648 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179695</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to cancel penalties imposed under section 271E of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in two separate cases. It was determined that the transactions in question did not warrant penalties as they were not considered deposits or loans under section 269T. The Tribunal emphasized the compliance of the assessee with tax filings, lack of concealment, and the legitimate source of funds, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2016 12:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=419342" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 648 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179695</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to cancel penalties imposed under section 271E of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in two separate cases. It was determined that the transactions in question did not warrant penalties as they were not considered deposits or loans under section 269T. The Tribunal emphasized the compliance of the assessee with tax filings, lack of concealment, and the legitimate source of funds, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179695</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>