<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 1 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2575</link>
    <description>The court disposed of the writ petition and pending applications as the Delhi authorities decided not to pursue further action on the summons issued due to a jurisdictional conflict with the Ghaziabad Commissionerate, where the issue was already being addressed. The Petitioner was advised to address any grievances directly with the Ghaziabad Commissionerate or through appropriate legal channels.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 13:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41934" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 1 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2575</link>
      <description>The court disposed of the writ petition and pending applications as the Delhi authorities decided not to pursue further action on the summons issued due to a jurisdictional conflict with the Ghaziabad Commissionerate, where the issue was already being addressed. The Petitioner was advised to address any grievances directly with the Ghaziabad Commissionerate or through appropriate legal channels.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2575</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>