<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 215 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325031</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of adjustments for payments under service level agreements, regional head office expenses, and delayed realization of trade debts. It also determined that software charges were revenue expenses, not capital. The appeal outcome was pronounced on 29th February 2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2017 12:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=419325" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 215 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325031</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of adjustments for payments under service level agreements, regional head office expenses, and delayed realization of trade debts. It also determined that software charges were revenue expenses, not capital. The appeal outcome was pronounced on 29th February 2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325031</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>