<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 206 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325022</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 58,00,000 made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, finding that the assessee had proven the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the share applicants. The Tribunal held that the principles from the Supreme Court judgment in Lovely Exports (P) Ltd. were applicable, criticizing the AO for not conducting further inquiries. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2016 11:02:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=419316" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 206 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325022</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 58,00,000 made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, finding that the assessee had proven the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the share applicants. The Tribunal held that the principles from the Supreme Court judgment in Lovely Exports (P) Ltd. were applicable, criticizing the AO for not conducting further inquiries. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325022</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>