<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 205 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325021</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s refund claim of Rs. 71,74,496/- for service tax paid on royalty post-merger, determining that the service rendered post-merger constituted a service to self, making the tax refundable. The Tribunal also found that the doctrine of unjust enrichment did not apply as the appellant had not passed on the tax burden, granting the refund and setting aside the order for recovery with interest and penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2016 10:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=419315" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 205 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325021</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s refund claim of Rs. 71,74,496/- for service tax paid on royalty post-merger, determining that the service rendered post-merger constituted a service to self, making the tax refundable. The Tribunal also found that the doctrine of unjust enrichment did not apply as the appellant had not passed on the tax burden, granting the refund and setting aside the order for recovery with interest and penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325021</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>