<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 203 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325019</link>
    <description>The Member found that the disputed services, including Health Club and Fitness Center, Transport Goods by Road, and Electricity Expenses, were integral to the appellant&#039;s business activities. The appeal was allowed, modifying the disallowance of Cenvat Credit for these services in the refund claims. The adjudicating authority was directed to process the refund claim, recognizing the appellant&#039;s eligibility for Cenvat Credit and service tax refund for the exported services.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 14:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=419313" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 203 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325019</link>
      <description>The Member found that the disputed services, including Health Club and Fitness Center, Transport Goods by Road, and Electricity Expenses, were integral to the appellant&#039;s business activities. The appeal was allowed, modifying the disallowance of Cenvat Credit for these services in the refund claims. The adjudicating authority was directed to process the refund claim, recognizing the appellant&#039;s eligibility for Cenvat Credit and service tax refund for the exported services.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325019</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>