https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325014 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)'s decision in a case involving alleged failure to maintain separate accounts for inputs used in manufacturing finished goods. The Tribunal found the respondent compliant with separate account requirements, emphasizing no fraud or suppression of facts. They concluded the extended limitation period couldn't apply and dismissed the Revenue's appeal, affirming the Commissioner (Appeals)'s order. en-us Mon, 08 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Nov 2016 11:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325014 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)'s decision in a case involving alleged failure to maintain separate accounts for inputs used in manufacturing finished goods. The Tribunal found the respondent compliant with separate account requirements, emphasizing no fraud or suppression of facts. They concluded the extended limitation period couldn't apply and dismissed the Revenue's appeal, affirming the Commissioner (Appeals)'s order. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 08 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325014