<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 1112 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179683</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions of Rs. 46,72,800/-, Rs. 12,77,200/-, and Rs. 10,00,000/- in an income tax case. The tribunal found lack of evidence linking the seized documents to the assessee, absence of corroborative material, and failure to establish undisclosed income sources. The tribunal applied stare decisis from a previous case with similar facts and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal. The assessee&#039;s cross-objection was also dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2023 17:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=419293" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 1112 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179683</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions of Rs. 46,72,800/-, Rs. 12,77,200/-, and Rs. 10,00,000/- in an income tax case. The tribunal found lack of evidence linking the seized documents to the assessee, absence of corroborative material, and failure to establish undisclosed income sources. The tribunal applied stare decisis from a previous case with similar facts and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal. The assessee&#039;s cross-objection was also dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179683</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>