<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 1156 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179682</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance of commission payment under section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of tax at source. The Tribunal held that since the services were not rendered in India, the commission payment was not taxable in India, citing Circular No. 786 and precedent case law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2016 10:52:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=419292" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 1156 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179682</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance of commission payment under section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of tax at source. The Tribunal held that since the services were not rendered in India, the commission payment was not taxable in India, citing Circular No. 786 and precedent case law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179682</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>