<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 896 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179680</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed regarding the disallowed depreciation due to foreign exchange fluctuation, product development expenditure, advertisement and brand promotion expenses. The provision of warranty issue was sent back for reassessment. The loss on foreign exchange forward contract was treated as a capital loss and the appeal partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2016 10:35:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=419290" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 896 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179680</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed regarding the disallowed depreciation due to foreign exchange fluctuation, product development expenditure, advertisement and brand promotion expenses. The provision of warranty issue was sent back for reassessment. The loss on foreign exchange forward contract was treated as a capital loss and the appeal partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179680</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>