<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 830 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179666</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision regarding the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that TDS had been deposited in most cases before filing the return and upheld the disallowance only for cases where TDS was not made. The decision was in line with previous rulings and the Tribunal&#039;s interpretation of the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2017 13:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=419269" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 830 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179666</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision regarding the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that TDS had been deposited in most cases before filing the return and upheld the disallowance only for cases where TDS was not made. The decision was in line with previous rulings and the Tribunal&#039;s interpretation of the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179666</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>