<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 1057 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179664</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, holding that income from derivative transactions should be classified as capital gains or losses, not business income or losses. The Tribunal did not address the alternative plea regarding the application of the Treaty between India and Australia as the primary issue was resolved in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2016 16:31:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=419265" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 1057 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179664</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, holding that income from derivative transactions should be classified as capital gains or losses, not business income or losses. The Tribunal did not address the alternative plea regarding the application of the Treaty between India and Australia as the primary issue was resolved in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179664</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>