<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 1056 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179663</link>
    <description>The tribunal found in favor of the assessee, ruling that deductions under section 80IB could be claimed despite a delayed filing of the return, as section 80AC is directory and not mandatory. The case was remitted back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh assessment, allowing the assessee to provide additional evidence and reasons for the delay. The assessee&#039;s appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2018 12:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=419262" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 1056 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179663</link>
      <description>The tribunal found in favor of the assessee, ruling that deductions under section 80IB could be claimed despite a delayed filing of the return, as section 80AC is directory and not mandatory. The case was remitted back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh assessment, allowing the assessee to provide additional evidence and reasons for the delay. The assessee&#039;s appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179663</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>