<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (6) TMI 128 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2566</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the original valuation and duty payment, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order and granting relief to the appellants. The judgment emphasized the independent status of the appellants as job workers, highlighting the importance of contractual terms and operational independence in determining duty liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 09:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41925" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (6) TMI 128 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2566</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the original valuation and duty payment, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order and granting relief to the appellants. The judgment emphasized the independent status of the appellants as job workers, highlighting the importance of contractual terms and operational independence in determining duty liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2566</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>