<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 642 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179658</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision that income from share transactions should be classified as &quot;Short Term Capital Gain and Long Term Capital Gain&quot; rather than &quot;Business or Profession.&quot; The appeal by the revenue challenging this classification was dismissed, emphasizing the rule of consistency in tax treatment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2016 13:26:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=419246" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 642 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179658</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision that income from share transactions should be classified as &quot;Short Term Capital Gain and Long Term Capital Gain&quot; rather than &quot;Business or Profession.&quot; The appeal by the revenue challenging this classification was dismissed, emphasizing the rule of consistency in tax treatment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179658</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>