<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (9) TMI 414 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179653</link>
    <description>The Admissions Committee was validly constituted under the Vice-Chancellor&#039;s urgent-action power because immediate action was necessary and the university authority could not then act. Its statutory power to lay down admission policy, read with the provisions on admission criteria and methods, was broad enough to include prescribing an entrance test for degree courses. Prior approval by the Academic Council was not required, and the absence of prior Executive Council approval did not invalidate the resolution. The challenge therefore failed, the quashing order was set aside, and the University was directed to proceed with admissions for the immediate year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2016 13:04:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=419240" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (9) TMI 414 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179653</link>
      <description>The Admissions Committee was validly constituted under the Vice-Chancellor&#039;s urgent-action power because immediate action was necessary and the university authority could not then act. Its statutory power to lay down admission policy, read with the provisions on admission criteria and methods, was broad enough to include prescribing an entrance test for degree courses. Prior approval by the Academic Council was not required, and the absence of prior Executive Council approval did not invalidate the resolution. The challenge therefore failed, the quashing order was set aside, and the University was directed to proceed with admissions for the immediate year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179653</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>