<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 58 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2565</link>
    <description>Import of a new vehicle could not be denied exemption from licensing conditions without a proper examination of whether the prescribed type approval or conformity of production certificate was required and without giving the importer an opportunity to produce it; the matter was remitted for fresh consideration. The declared transaction value also could not be rejected merely by applying the list-price method where the importer had filed an invoice and supporting particulars and no adverse finding had been recorded on their genuineness; the transaction value was directed to be accepted for reassessment. Confiscation, redemption fine, and penalty were set aside, with the issue sent back for fresh decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 09:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41924" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 58 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2565</link>
      <description>Import of a new vehicle could not be denied exemption from licensing conditions without a proper examination of whether the prescribed type approval or conformity of production certificate was required and without giving the importer an opportunity to produce it; the matter was remitted for fresh consideration. The declared transaction value also could not be rejected merely by applying the list-price method where the importer had filed an invoice and supporting particulars and no adverse finding had been recorded on their genuineness; the transaction value was directed to be accepted for reassessment. Confiscation, redemption fine, and penalty were set aside, with the issue sent back for fresh decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2565</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>