<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 180 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272368</link>
    <description>The court addressed a challenge to a recovery notice issued by the assessing officer for the amount due for the assessment year 2012-13. The petitioner sought a stay on recovery proceedings during the appeal, citing Section 220(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court clarified that the appellate authority cannot grant interim stay, emphasizing the role of the assessing officer under Section 220(6). The judgment highlighted the need for the petitioner to approach the assessing officer for deferment of recovery proceedings. The court directed the petitioner to submit an application under Section 220(6) within a specified period, with recovery proceedings to be on hold pending a decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2016 17:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=419211" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 180 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272368</link>
      <description>The court addressed a challenge to a recovery notice issued by the assessing officer for the amount due for the assessment year 2012-13. The petitioner sought a stay on recovery proceedings during the appeal, citing Section 220(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court clarified that the appellate authority cannot grant interim stay, emphasizing the role of the assessing officer under Section 220(6). The judgment highlighted the need for the petitioner to approach the assessing officer for deferment of recovery proceedings. The court directed the petitioner to submit an application under Section 220(6) within a specified period, with recovery proceedings to be on hold pending a decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272368</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>