https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272367 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, setting aside the draft Assessment order dated 30th March, 2015, due to procedural deficiencies. The court emphasized the importance of procedural fairness and adherence to legal requirements in tax assessments, highlighting concerns about jurisdictional violations and delays in addressing objections. The judgment made the rule absolute in favor of the petitioner, with no order as to costs, underscoring the significance of due process in assessment proceedings. en-us Wed, 27 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Mar 2026 17:01:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272367 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, setting aside the draft Assessment order dated 30th March, 2015, due to procedural deficiencies. The court emphasized the importance of procedural fairness and adherence to legal requirements in tax assessments, highlighting concerns about jurisdictional violations and delays in addressing objections. The judgment made the rule absolute in favor of the petitioner, with no order as to costs, underscoring the significance of due process in assessment proceedings. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 27 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272367