<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 176 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272364</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court declined to entertain a tax appeal where the impugned addition was only Rs. 3.85 lakhs and the resulting tax effect was negligible. It treated the smallness of the addition and the minimal revenue consequence as sufficient to conclude that the matter did not warrant further consideration on merits, and dismissed the appeal on that ground alone.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2020 07:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=419207" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 176 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272364</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court declined to entertain a tax appeal where the impugned addition was only Rs. 3.85 lakhs and the resulting tax effect was negligible. It treated the smallness of the addition and the minimal revenue consequence as sufficient to conclude that the matter did not warrant further consideration on merits, and dismissed the appeal on that ground alone.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272364</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>