<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 171 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272359</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the addition of cash deposited to the bank as income from undisclosed sources. The Tribunal found that the assessee had withdrawn sufficient cash before the deposits, and as there was no evidence to show the cash was used for other purposes, ruled in favor of the assessee. The lower authorities were instructed to delete the addition, with the judgment issued on September 21, 2015, in Ahmedabad.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2016 06:31:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=419202" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 171 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272359</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the addition of cash deposited to the bank as income from undisclosed sources. The Tribunal found that the assessee had withdrawn sufficient cash before the deposits, and as there was no evidence to show the cash was used for other purposes, ruled in favor of the assessee. The lower authorities were instructed to delete the addition, with the judgment issued on September 21, 2015, in Ahmedabad.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272359</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>