https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179635 A wrong statement in the list of dates, asserting that a prior judgment had favoured the Revenue, led to dismissal of the appeal. The Court treated the incorrect representation as a sufficient ground to refuse relief, and also noted that a similar incorrect statement in another special leave petition had earlier been withdrawn by the Union of India. The operative effect was dismissal for falsehood in pleadings, with the Court relying on the inaccurate statement and the prior withdrawal as part of its reasoning. en-us Fri, 01 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 05 Mar 2016 18:45:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179635 A wrong statement in the list of dates, asserting that a prior judgment had favoured the Revenue, led to dismissal of the appeal. The Court treated the incorrect representation as a sufficient ground to refuse relief, and also noted that a similar incorrect statement in another special leave petition had earlier been withdrawn by the Union of India. The operative effect was dismissal for falsehood in pleadings, with the Court relying on the inaccurate statement and the prior withdrawal as part of its reasoning. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 01 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179635