<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 111 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2557</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order regarding the declaration of value for imported old and used plain photocopiers, determining them as non-freely importable capital goods. The valuation based on comparisons with imports at Calcutta port was deemed invalid due to insufficient evidence on the goods&#039; conditions. The Tribunal reduced the redemption fine and penalty, concluding that the enhancement of value was not justified. The appeal was disposed of accordingly, with the impugned order upheld in all other aspects.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 09:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41916" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 111 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2557</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order regarding the declaration of value for imported old and used plain photocopiers, determining them as non-freely importable capital goods. The valuation based on comparisons with imports at Calcutta port was deemed invalid due to insufficient evidence on the goods&#039; conditions. The Tribunal reduced the redemption fine and penalty, concluding that the enhancement of value was not justified. The appeal was disposed of accordingly, with the impugned order upheld in all other aspects.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2557</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>