<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (12) TMI 479 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179632</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision directing the Assessing Officer to allow full credit of T.D.S to the assessee, a secondary purchaser of bonds, at maturity. The Court agreed that the T.D.S credit should be given to the bondholder at maturity as per the CBDT circular and Section 199 of the Income Tax Act. The Court dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals, ruling that the secondary purchaser was entitled to the T.D.S credit, based on the amended Section 199 and the CBDT circular guidelines.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2016 18:15:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=419146" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (12) TMI 479 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179632</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision directing the Assessing Officer to allow full credit of T.D.S to the assessee, a secondary purchaser of bonds, at maturity. The Court agreed that the T.D.S credit should be given to the bondholder at maturity as per the CBDT circular and Section 199 of the Income Tax Act. The Court dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals, ruling that the secondary purchaser was entitled to the T.D.S credit, based on the amended Section 199 and the CBDT circular guidelines.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179632</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>