<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 1174 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179627</link>
    <description>The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed, and the order of the Ld. CIT(A) was upheld. The Comparable Uncontrolled Method (CUP) was deemed the most appropriate method for determining the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP), and the addition of Rs. 6.73 crores was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2016 17:50:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=419139" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 1174 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179627</link>
      <description>The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed, and the order of the Ld. CIT(A) was upheld. The Comparable Uncontrolled Method (CUP) was deemed the most appropriate method for determining the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP), and the addition of Rs. 6.73 crores was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179627</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>