https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179610 The Tribunal partially allowed the appeals, confirming various findings of the CIT(A) on issues such as disallowance of complimentary expenditure, payments to doctors, peak credit additions, building repairs, depreciation claims, and gross fee collection differences. The Tribunal emphasized consistency and proper verification of claims based on seized documents and available records, rejecting objections raised by the revenue on certain issues. en-us Tue, 07 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 05 Mar 2016 14:21:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179610 The Tribunal partially allowed the appeals, confirming various findings of the CIT(A) on issues such as disallowance of complimentary expenditure, payments to doctors, peak credit additions, building repairs, depreciation claims, and gross fee collection differences. The Tribunal emphasized consistency and proper verification of claims based on seized documents and available records, rejecting objections raised by the revenue on certain issues. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 07 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179610