https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179597 The Tribunal upheld the primary order confirming the Central Excise duty demand and penalties, rejecting the appeals due to the evidentiary value of statements, retractions, and admissions made by the parties involved. The Director's admission of shortages and payment of duty rendered him liable for penalty under Rule 26, with the Tribunal finding the evidence and circumstances supported sustaining the allegations and penalties imposed. en-us Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 05 Mar 2016 10:53:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179597 The Tribunal upheld the primary order confirming the Central Excise duty demand and penalties, rejecting the appeals due to the evidentiary value of statements, retractions, and admissions made by the parties involved. The Director's admission of shortages and payment of duty rendered him liable for penalty under Rule 26, with the Tribunal finding the evidence and circumstances supported sustaining the allegations and penalties imposed. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179597