<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 143 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272331</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the order of the ld. CIT(A) regarding the disallowance of depreciation for the assessment year 2007-08. It held that income from property held under trust should be computed based on commercial principles, allowing for depreciation. The Tribunal clarified that granting exemption under section 11 and depreciation under section 32 does not result in double deduction. The decision was based on previous judgments and the independent applicability of the relevant sections of the Income Tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2016 10:45:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=419076" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 143 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272331</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the order of the ld. CIT(A) regarding the disallowance of depreciation for the assessment year 2007-08. It held that income from property held under trust should be computed based on commercial principles, allowing for depreciation. The Tribunal clarified that granting exemption under section 11 and depreciation under section 32 does not result in double deduction. The decision was based on previous judgments and the independent applicability of the relevant sections of the Income Tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272331</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>