https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272324 The Tribunal upheld the service tax demand under 'Real Estate Agent' service based on the services provided falling within this category as per the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) and definitions in the Finance Act. The appellant's argument that they were not a real estate agent was dismissed, emphasizing the clarity of the MoU and relevant legal definitions. The Tribunal ordered pre-deposit of the entire service tax liability within eight weeks, stressing the importance of compliance with tax laws and proper classification of services to prevent disputes. en-us Tue, 30 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 05 Mar 2016 10:43:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272324 The Tribunal upheld the service tax demand under 'Real Estate Agent' service based on the services provided falling within this category as per the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) and definitions in the Finance Act. The appellant's argument that they were not a real estate agent was dismissed, emphasizing the clarity of the MoU and relevant legal definitions. The Tribunal ordered pre-deposit of the entire service tax liability within eight weeks, stressing the importance of compliance with tax laws and proper classification of services to prevent disputes. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 30 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272324