<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 134 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272322</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a State Government Organization, in a case concerning unjust enrichment on a refund claim for Central Excise Duty related to transmission towers. The Tribunal held that unjust enrichment does not apply to State Undertakings, as the duty had not been passed on to any other person. The appellant&#039;s income sources were deemed unrelated to the duty payment, leading to the allowance of the appeal with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2016 15:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=419067" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 134 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272322</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a State Government Organization, in a case concerning unjust enrichment on a refund claim for Central Excise Duty related to transmission towers. The Tribunal held that unjust enrichment does not apply to State Undertakings, as the duty had not been passed on to any other person. The appellant&#039;s income sources were deemed unrelated to the duty payment, leading to the allowance of the appeal with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272322</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>