<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 125 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272313</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals) decision and upheld the original authority&#039;s order, ruling that the appellant&#039;s products, as organic surface active products in liquid form, were not liable for duty under Section 4A of the Central Excise Act. The appeals were allowed in favor of the appellant, providing consequential relief as necessary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2016 15:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=419058" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 125 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272313</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals) decision and upheld the original authority&#039;s order, ruling that the appellant&#039;s products, as organic surface active products in liquid form, were not liable for duty under Section 4A of the Central Excise Act. The appeals were allowed in favor of the appellant, providing consequential relief as necessary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272313</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>