https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2538 The Punjab & Haryana High Court dismissed the appeal challenging orders passed by CESTAT, citing lack of jurisdiction as the original order was from Mumbai and the appellate order from Delhi. The Court emphasized the need for the requisite territorial jurisdiction and clarified that the situs of framing law does not confer jurisdiction on a High Court. The appellant's argument that the cause of action arose in Chandigarh was not accepted. The appeal was disposed of without costs, and the withdrawn Customs Case was directed to be restored in Delhi High Court, which had jurisdiction. en-us Mon, 12 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 11 Jul 2009 17:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2538 The Punjab & Haryana High Court dismissed the appeal challenging orders passed by CESTAT, citing lack of jurisdiction as the original order was from Mumbai and the appellate order from Delhi. The Court emphasized the need for the requisite territorial jurisdiction and clarified that the situs of framing law does not confer jurisdiction on a High Court. The appellant's argument that the cause of action arose in Chandigarh was not accepted. The appeal was disposed of without costs, and the withdrawn Customs Case was directed to be restored in Delhi High Court, which had jurisdiction. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 12 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2538