<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 1099 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179566</link>
    <description>The court upheld the order of the learned Single Judge dated 03.11.2011, which affirmed the rejection of the appellant&#039;s selection as an Anganwadi Worker. The court found respondent No.5&#039;s application valid despite submitting the Nativity Certificate after the cut-off date, considering the application of Section 10 of the General Clauses Act regarding deadlines falling on holidays. The Writ Appeal challenging the decision was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2016 12:21:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=418957" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 1099 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179566</link>
      <description>The court upheld the order of the learned Single Judge dated 03.11.2011, which affirmed the rejection of the appellant&#039;s selection as an Anganwadi Worker. The court found respondent No.5&#039;s application valid despite submitting the Nativity Certificate after the cut-off date, considering the application of Section 10 of the General Clauses Act regarding deadlines falling on holidays. The Writ Appeal challenging the decision was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179566</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>