<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 995 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179558</link>
    <description>Goods with independent automatic data processing capacity, free programmability, and the ability to execute programmes with logical decision-making without human intervention are classifiable as automatic data processing machines under Chapter 84. Chapter Note 5(e) does not apply where the products themselves satisfy the essential characteristics of ADP machines, even if used for specific applications, because that note is confined to machines performing a specific function other than data processing and working with an ADP machine. The residual specific-function headings were therefore inapplicable, and the competing classification was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2016 11:10:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=418951" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 995 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179558</link>
      <description>Goods with independent automatic data processing capacity, free programmability, and the ability to execute programmes with logical decision-making without human intervention are classifiable as automatic data processing machines under Chapter 84. Chapter Note 5(e) does not apply where the products themselves satisfy the essential characteristics of ADP machines, even if used for specific applications, because that note is confined to machines performing a specific function other than data processing and working with an ADP machine. The residual specific-function headings were therefore inapplicable, and the competing classification was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179558</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>