<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 113 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272301</link>
    <description>The Tribunal addressed cross-appeals by the assessee and Revenue regarding disallowance of claimed amounts and addition of unexplained jewellery for the assessment year 2011-12. The Tribunal upheld the disallowance and addition of jewellery, citing potential unaccounted money. However, it allowed the appeal on the addition of unexplained jewellery, noting discrepancies and lack of substantial evidence. Jurisdictional concerns were not argued, leading to partial allowance of the appeal. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal on charging interest, finding the jewellery adequately explained. Ultimately, some grounds of appeal were allowed while others were dismissed based on merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2016 11:07:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=418938" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 113 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272301</link>
      <description>The Tribunal addressed cross-appeals by the assessee and Revenue regarding disallowance of claimed amounts and addition of unexplained jewellery for the assessment year 2011-12. The Tribunal upheld the disallowance and addition of jewellery, citing potential unaccounted money. However, it allowed the appeal on the addition of unexplained jewellery, noting discrepancies and lack of substantial evidence. Jurisdictional concerns were not argued, leading to partial allowance of the appeal. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal on charging interest, finding the jewellery adequately explained. Ultimately, some grounds of appeal were allowed while others were dismissed based on merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272301</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>