<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 107 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272295</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand for Service Tax, interest, and penalties under Section 78. The decision emphasized the absence of fraudulent intent or suppression of facts, concluding that the appellant&#039;s actions were bona fide and not subject to extended time provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2016 15:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=418932" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 107 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272295</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand for Service Tax, interest, and penalties under Section 78. The decision emphasized the absence of fraudulent intent or suppression of facts, concluding that the appellant&#039;s actions were bona fide and not subject to extended time provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272295</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>