<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 1216 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179552</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing Cenvat Credit on construction services for the dormitory within the factory premises. The tribunal found the dormitory essential for technicians/engineers&#039; availability for machinery maintenance due to the remote location, distinguishing it from cases where residential colonies were outside factory premises. Citing a relevant High Court decision, the tribunal held that the dormitory had an integral connection with the manufacturing activity, making it eligible for input service credit. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with any consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 14:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=418918" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 1216 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179552</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing Cenvat Credit on construction services for the dormitory within the factory premises. The tribunal found the dormitory essential for technicians/engineers&#039; availability for machinery maintenance due to the remote location, distinguishing it from cases where residential colonies were outside factory premises. Citing a relevant High Court decision, the tribunal held that the dormitory had an integral connection with the manufacturing activity, making it eligible for input service credit. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with any consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179552</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>