https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179554 The High Court granted time for the filing of counter affidavit and ordered the stay of transit fee recovery against the petitioners until the next listing date. The petitioners had challenged the levy of transit fee on non-forest produce, specifically Kota Stone and Sand Stone, arguing that these products are not classified as forest produce and are not transported through forest areas. Despite previous orders by the Apex Court regarding transit fee realization, the High Court directed the respondents to maintain a separate account for the collected fees but did not suspend the actual realization of transit fee. en-us Wed, 06 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Mar 2016 10:57:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179554 The High Court granted time for the filing of counter affidavit and ordered the stay of transit fee recovery against the petitioners until the next listing date. The petitioners had challenged the levy of transit fee on non-forest produce, specifically Kota Stone and Sand Stone, arguing that these products are not classified as forest produce and are not transported through forest areas. Despite previous orders by the Apex Court regarding transit fee realization, the High Court directed the respondents to maintain a separate account for the collected fees but did not suspend the actual realization of transit fee. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 06 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179554