https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179555 The tribunal ruled in favor of the main appellant, a thermocol products manufacturer, in an appeal concerning the confiscation of unaccounted raw material and finished goods. It found no evidence of intent to clear goods clandestinely, leading to the decision that the goods were not liable for confiscation. Additionally, the tribunal held that redemption fine and penalty were not imposable due to the lack of intent to evade duty. Compliance with Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 was examined, and the tribunal concluded that the provisions were not met, resulting in the disposal of the appeals in favor of the appellant with consequential relief granted. en-us Fri, 20 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Mar 2016 10:57:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179555 The tribunal ruled in favor of the main appellant, a thermocol products manufacturer, in an appeal concerning the confiscation of unaccounted raw material and finished goods. It found no evidence of intent to clear goods clandestinely, leading to the decision that the goods were not liable for confiscation. Additionally, the tribunal held that redemption fine and penalty were not imposable due to the lack of intent to evade duty. Compliance with Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 was examined, and the tribunal concluded that the provisions were not met, resulting in the disposal of the appeals in favor of the appellant with consequential relief granted. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 20 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179555