<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 1115 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179549</link>
    <description>In a valuation dispute involving goods manufactured through job workers and sold by the principal manufacturer, the tribunal found a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit because there was no material showing that the principal manufacturer and the job workers were related or that the price was not the sole consideration. The Chartered Accountant&#039;s CAS-4 certificate was treated as unreliable because the cost computation did not properly account for Cenvat credit. Adoption of the highest profit margin of 41.48% was also unsustainable, as the valuation rules contemplate normal transaction value and the record did not justify rejecting the transaction pattern in favour of a highest-price approach. Waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery were therefore granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2016 10:54:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=418910" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 1115 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179549</link>
      <description>In a valuation dispute involving goods manufactured through job workers and sold by the principal manufacturer, the tribunal found a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit because there was no material showing that the principal manufacturer and the job workers were related or that the price was not the sole consideration. The Chartered Accountant&#039;s CAS-4 certificate was treated as unreliable because the cost computation did not properly account for Cenvat credit. Adoption of the highest profit margin of 41.48% was also unsustainable, as the valuation rules contemplate normal transaction value and the record did not justify rejecting the transaction pattern in favour of a highest-price approach. Waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery were therefore granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179549</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>