<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 1110 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179543</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions in the case, allowing the interest on Share Application Money (SAM) as a deductible expense and including prior period expenditure in the computation of book profit under section 115JB of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming that SAM creates a debtor-creditor relationship until share allotment and that prior period expenses should be considered in determining net profit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2016 15:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=418902" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 1110 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179543</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions in the case, allowing the interest on Share Application Money (SAM) as a deductible expense and including prior period expenditure in the computation of book profit under section 115JB of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming that SAM creates a debtor-creditor relationship until share allotment and that prior period expenses should be considered in determining net profit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179543</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>