<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 991 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179542</link>
    <description>The Bombay HC dismissed the appeals after holding that the questions raised were already covered against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee by Commissioner of Income Tax v. Bramha Associates. Accepting counsel&#039;s statement that the precedent governed the disputed issues, the Court found no further adjudication was necessary and disposed of the appeals accordingly. No order as to costs was made.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2016 10:30:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=418901" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 991 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179542</link>
      <description>The Bombay HC dismissed the appeals after holding that the questions raised were already covered against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee by Commissioner of Income Tax v. Bramha Associates. Accepting counsel&#039;s statement that the precedent governed the disputed issues, the Court found no further adjudication was necessary and disposed of the appeals accordingly. No order as to costs was made.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179542</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>